[amillia]

Dziewczyny, ale próbujcie chociaż czytać ze zrozumieniem. Nikt nie pisał, że kobiety nie oglądają porno, albo że nie reagują w ogóle na widok przystojnego mężczyzny.

Kobiety i mężczyzn podniecają różne rzeczy w różnym stopniu, przy czym mężczyzn częściej stymulacja wizualna, koniec kropka no. Proszę, potwierdzone przez neurologów i biologów:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2739403/

Tutaj bardziej językiem laików, ale z podanymi źródłami i badaniami: https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl...e-men-vs-women

"It's essential to note that the literature specifically studying men's arousal patterns (gay as well as straight) has repeatedly emphasized their sensitivity to visual cues. As soon as the lust-inspiring image registers in their brain, they become turned-on - not only physically but psychologically, too. Exposure to such erotic stimuli immediately activates the parts of their brain related to getting an erection.

The currently available data strongly support the idea that men and women differ in the sorts of stimuli that they find sexually attractive and arousing."

To nie jest kwestia na "wydaje mi się" czy "mam inną opinię", to są fakty potwierdzone przez kilkadziesiąt badań naukowych, wiele z nich cytowanych zresztą we wstępie do pierwszego badania, które zalinkowałam.

Visual cues do matter for women, but not really more than other sensory ones. And to become significantly aroused, women definitely need more cues than men. As already suggested, a man's voice and scent is important, as is the sensuality of his touch. Visual cues, which do not focus on sex organs at all, include a man's face, eyes (as in, the more intense the better), color of his hair, and his general body shape. Still, more than anything else, it's the combination of many physical and psychological cues that succeeds in turning women on. And this is why romantic stories, using the written word to capture both their imagination and libido, have from the start been the most popular form of erotica for them.